IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Staub Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1857 0.2008 0.5294 0.5724
2012-13 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 55 10 20 30 0.545 0.2025 0.2088 0.5776 0.5955
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 57 13 18 31 0.544 0.2020 0.1981 0.5759 0.5649
2014-15 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 60 26 34 60 1.000 0.3713 0.3448 1.0588 0.9831
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Denver D1 NCHC SR 41 8 8 16 0.390
2017-18 Denver D1 NCHC JR 41 7 15 22 0.537
2016-17 Denver D1 NCHC SO 44 10 10 20 0.455
2015-16 Denver D1 NCHC FR 32 5 4 9 0.281
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2015-16 · Denver
+14.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12084
Forward overall
#498
Forward born in 1994
#690
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Varone
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.