IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Kopacka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1225 0.1274 0.3518 0.3658
2012-13 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 55 2 10 12 0.218 0.0802 0.0794 0.2303 0.2279
2013-14 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 55 11 21 32 0.582 0.2138 0.2009 0.6141 0.5770
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA SR 31 3 4 7 0.226
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA JR 16 1 5 6 0.375
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA SO 32 0 10 10 0.312
2014-15 Air Force D1 AHA FR 32 1 9 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2014-15 · Air Force
+117.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8670
Defenseman overall
#1129
Defenseman born in 1993
#3120
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Panetta
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Carlson
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.