IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Lafayette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Mexico Mustangs NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 4 13 17 0.415 0.1164 0.1093 0.3409 0.3200
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Elmira D1 UCHC SR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2018-19 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2017-18 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 26 0 4 4 0.154
2016-17 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2015-16 · Elmira
+12.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43417
Forward overall
#1747
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Wilson
Marian · 2010-11
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carmine Alberga
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Rudrud
Rivier · 2024-25
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.