IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Rudrud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Powell River Kings BCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Providence Capitals EHL 46 11 12 23 0.500 0.1759 0.1762 0.2452 0.2456
2024-25 Providence Capitals EHL 34 5 12 17 0.500 0.1759 0.1671 0.2452 0.2330
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Rivier D3 MASCAC FR 25 8 8 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2025-26 · Rivier
+336.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32078
Forward overall
#1924
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Axell
Wisconsin-Superior · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Herold
Elmira · 2009-10
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Coyle
Utica · 2007-08
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.