IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Bleck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 43 4 11 15 0.349 0.1239 0.1294 0.3662 0.3824
2013-14 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 11 11 22 0.393 0.1396 0.1388 0.4125 0.4100
2014-15 — NAHL 56 17 14 31 0.554 0.1966 0.1851 0.5812 0.5473
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE GR 17 4 7 11 0.647
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE SR 29 20 19 39 1.345
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE JR 25 11 11 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2015-16 · Endicott
+517.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31205
Forward overall
#1187
Forward born in 1994
#2839
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Chakeen
UMass Boston · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Martin
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Boby
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.