IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Ginnetti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-09 Country: Italy
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Langley Rivermen BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Langley Rivermen BCHL 49 3 11 14 0.286 0.1101 0.1189 0.4155 0.4489
2016-17 Langley Rivermen BCHL 57 9 47 56 0.983 0.3786 0.3897 1.4289 1.4707
2017-18 — USHL 51 0 3 3 0.059 0.0347 0.0333 0.1764 0.1693
2018-19 — USHL 25 0 7 7 0.280 0.1652 0.1500 0.8402 0.7629
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8879
Defenseman overall
#1678
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Rudy
Hobart · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Schneider
Lawrence · 2022-23
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Enns
Marian · 2018-19
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.