← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Caponi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.4956 0.4804 2.4877 2.4114
2018-19 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 42 9 5 14 0.333 0.1966 0.1960 1.0010 0.9979
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 30 12 9 21 0.700 0.4129 0.4129 2.1024 2.1024
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Denver D1 NCHC GR 42 5 4 9 0.214
2023-24 Denver D1 NCHC SR 44 5 9 14 0.318
2022-23 Denver D1 NCHC JR 39 2 4 6 0.154
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC SO 36 4 1 5 0.139
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC FR 24 2 2 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Denver
-37.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13025
Forward overall
#552
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2025-26
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.