← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Caponi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.5303 0.5140 2.4969 2.4203
2018-19 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 42 9 5 14 0.333 0.2122 0.2115 0.9988 0.9957
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 30 12 9 21 0.700 0.4458 0.4458 2.0977 2.0977
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Denver D1 NCHC GR 42 5 4 9 0.214
2023-24 Denver D1 NCHC SR 44 5 9 14 0.318
2022-23 Denver D1 NCHC JR 39 2 4 6 0.154
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC SO 36 4 1 5 0.139
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC FR 24 2 2 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Denver
-41.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7498
Forward overall
#175
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.20 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.