IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Okeley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 53 4 13 17 0.321 0.1179 0.1222 0.3386 0.3508
2014-15 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 59 13 18 31 0.525 0.1930 0.1898 0.5546 0.5455
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 27 9 8 17 0.630
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 25 4 10 14 0.560
2016-17 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 23 6 4 10 0.435
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA FR 24 2 2 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2015-16 · Air Force
+19.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31972
Forward overall
#1298
Forward born in 1995
#3012
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Magnavite
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Van Horn
Adrian · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Beale
Johnson & Wales · 2022-23
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.