IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Doyon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 51 8 6 14 0.275 0.1009 0.1062 0.2897 0.3049
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 7 9 16 0.286 0.1050 0.1050 0.3016 0.3016
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 7 10 17 0.347 0.1275 0.1219 0.3662 0.3500
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Aurora D1 NCHA SR 20 5 11 16 0.800
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 20 5 11 16 0.800
2018-19 Aurora D1 NCHA JR 27 9 11 20 0.741
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 27 9 11 20 0.741
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 23 8 6 14 0.609
2016-17 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 19 4 8 12 0.632
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2016-17 · Aurora
+540.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41673
Forward overall
#1758
Forward born in 1995
#4483
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Marcoux
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Scott
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.