IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Doyon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 51 8 6 14 0.275 0.1019 0.1072 0.2906 0.3059
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 7 9 16 0.286 0.1061 0.1061 0.3025 0.3025
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 7 10 17 0.347 0.1288 0.1231 0.3673 0.3511
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 20 5 11 16 0.800
2018-19 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 27 9 11 20 0.741
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 23 8 6 14 0.609
2016-17 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 19 4 8 12 0.632
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2016-17 · Aurora
+534.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34565
Forward overall
#1453
Forward born in 1995
#4315
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Marcoux
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Scott
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Aragon
New England · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.