IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Lichtenvoort Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-07-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Peoria Mustangs NA3HL 46 11 19 30 0.652 0.0831 0.0893 0.2063 0.2217
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 39 6 4 10 0.256 0.0942 0.0986 0.2710 0.2837
2014-15 Michigan Warriors NAHL 48 5 14 19 0.396 0.1454 0.1446 0.4183 0.4160
2015-16 — NAHL 49 4 12 16 0.327 0.1200 0.1140 0.3451 0.3280
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12772
Defenseman overall
#1697
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Don Rankin
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Hora
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Hall
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.