| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | IF Troja-Ljungby U20 | SHL-J20 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.051 | 0.0283 | 0.0296 | 0.0685 | 0.0716 |
| 2011-12 | IF Björklöven U20 | SHL-J20 | 37 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.162 | 0.0896 | 0.0896 | 0.2165 | 0.2165 |
| 2012-13 | Tingsryds AIF U20 | SHL-J20 | 45 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.244 | 0.1350 | 0.1282 | 0.3262 | 0.3098 |
| 2013-14 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 51 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.137 | 0.0488 | 0.0456 | 0.1442 | 0.1349 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | SR | 23 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 0.696 |
| 2016-17 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | JR | 28 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.536 |
| 2015-16 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | SO | 22 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.455 |
| 2014-15 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | FR | 15 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.467 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.