IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trent Dillinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 21 2 2 4 0.191 0.0700 0.0724 0.2011 0.2081
2014-15 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 30 5 6 11 0.367 0.1347 0.1323 0.3871 0.3803
2015-16 — NAHL 43 9 7 16 0.372 0.1367 0.1283 0.3928 0.3686
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 16 2 2 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2016-17 · Norwich
+124.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32691
Forward overall
#1327
Forward born in 1995
#3130
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Millin
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Deveny
Canton · 2014-15
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxim Tsegelnik
Albertus Magnus · 2023-24
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.