| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 41 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.049 | 0.0179 | 0.0193 | 0.0515 | 0.0556 |
| 2014-15 | St. Cloud Norsemen | NAHL | 39 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.308 | 0.1130 | 0.1161 | 0.3248 | 0.3338 |
| 2015-16 | St. Cloud Norsemen | NAHL | 50 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 0.380 | 0.1396 | 0.1373 | 0.4011 | 0.3945 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Gustavus Adolphus | D3 | MIAC | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.