← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Kennedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Austin Bruins NAHL 48 14 5 19 0.396 0.1454 0.1513 0.4178 0.4346
2015-16 Austin Bruins NAHL 46 10 5 15 0.326 0.1198 0.1193 0.3442 0.3428
2016-17 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 57 13 18 31 0.544 0.1998 0.1882 0.5741 0.5406
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SR 7 2 2 4 0.571
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 7 2 2 4 0.571
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen JR 28 5 2 7 0.250
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 28 5 2 7 0.250
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SO 23 2 0 2 0.087
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 23 2 0 2 0.087
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+11.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32002
Forward overall
#1355
Forward born in 1996
#3021
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2015-16
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.