← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Schachle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 57 6 8 14 0.246 0.0902 0.0983 0.2592 0.2826
2015-16 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 53 4 6 10 0.189 0.0633 0.0650 0.1746 0.1794
2016-17 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 50 11 6 17 0.340 0.1249 0.1239 0.3589 0.3559
2017-18 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 59 24 27 51 0.864 0.3176 0.2993 0.9124 0.8597
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 LIU D1 JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2020-21 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 32 7 7 14 0.438
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 28 2 4 6 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2018-19 · Alaska Anchorage
+9.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26024
Forward overall
#1178
Forward born in 1997
#2132
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2010-11
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.