IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Roeder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 45 9 22 31 0.689 0.0865 0.0934 0.2175 0.2350
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 39 2 11 13 0.333 0.1225 0.1273 0.3518 0.3656
2015-16 Janesville Jets NAHL 51 6 10 16 0.314 0.1153 0.1147 0.3311 0.3294
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 57 7 25 32 0.561 0.2063 0.1940 0.5926 0.5573
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 36 3 5 8 0.222
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 32 1 3 4 0.125
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 22 2 1 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · Northern Michigan
-11.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8707
Defenseman overall
#1392
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salvatore Cerrato
Utica · 2024-25
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Starzi
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morris
Elmira · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.