IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Noel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 51 0 3 3 0.059 0.0216 0.0223 0.0621 0.0642
2015-16 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 1 11 12 0.200 0.0735 0.0727 0.2111 0.2089
2016-17 — NAHL 32 2 5 7 0.219 0.0804 0.0752 0.2309 0.2159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA — 22 2 3 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · Ferris State
+224.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22072
Defenseman overall
#2530
Defenseman born in 1996
#6130
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin McElaney
Colby · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Allen
Utica · 2017-18
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathieu Parent
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.