← New Search ↗ Social Card

Clark Kerner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 NAHL 37 8 8 16 0.432 0.1606 0.1681 0.4578 0.4793
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 49 7 19 26 0.531 0.1970 0.1970 0.5618 0.5618
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 42 26 33 59 1.405 0.3959 0.3959 1.1373 1.1373
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 26 12 15 27 1.038
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 25 8 12 20 0.800
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 24 9 10 19 0.792
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 23 13 15 28 1.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.22
2021-22 · Norwich
+746.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12084
Forward overall
#318
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Air Force (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.