← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Boltmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-19 Country: USA
2020 · Round 3, Pick #80  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0737 0.0793 0.3754 0.4040
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 17 2 7 9 0.529 0.3123 0.3123 1.5900 1.5900
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 35 2 10 12 0.343
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 30 0 2 2 0.067
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 37 1 4 5 0.135
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 40 1 12 13 0.325
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4602
Defenseman overall
#1059
Defenseman born in 2001
#2112
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Western Michigan
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keene State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.