IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Boltmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-19 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #80  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0768 0.0826 0.3683 0.3963
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 17 2 7 9 0.529 0.3254 0.3254 1.5597 1.5597
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 35 2 10 12 0.343
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 30 0 2 2 0.067
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 37 1 4 5 0.135
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 40 1 12 13 0.325
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4395
Defenseman overall
#1031
Defenseman born in 2001
#2123
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kale Bennett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Western Michigan
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cade Hanley
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Smith
Hamilton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeffrey Gauld
Canton · 2014-15
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.