IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Adkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 11 2 3 5 0.455 0.1050 0.1178 0.2224 0.2494
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 33 17 10 27 0.818 0.0938 0.0938 0.1844 0.1844
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 22 9 4 13 0.591 0.0773 0.0773 0.2006 0.2006
2021-22 New England Wolves EHL 15 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47482
Forward overall
#2801
Forward born in 2001
#2153
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jack Billings
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Blake Christensen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Biagio Lerario
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Kohn
Tufts · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gianni Mangone
Marian · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.