IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colton Berg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Centennial High USHS-MN 25 15 10 25 1.000 0.1232 0.1134 0.2429 0.2236
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 32 4 8 12 0.375 0.1332 0.1335 0.3937 0.3945
2016-17 — NAHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0710 0.0673 0.2100 0.1990
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 — JR 14 1 3 4 0.286
2018-19 St. Thomas D3 — SO 8 1 0 1 0.125
2017-18 St. Thomas D3 — FR 13 2 1 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2017-18 · St. Thomas
+160.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11183
Defenseman overall
#1631
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Dabrowski
Hamline · 2018-19
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kade Smigaj
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Nickels
Johnson & Wales · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.