icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Gates Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-24 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2015-16	Janesville Jets	NAHL	50	2	9	11	0.220	0.0808	0.0873	0.2322	0.2508
2016-17	Janesville Jets	NAHL	58	9	25	34	0.586	0.2154	0.2209	0.6187	0.6346

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	23	0	1	1	0.043
2019-20	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	31	3	4	7	0.226
2018-19	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	6	0	0	0	0.000
2017-18	Colorado College	D1	NCHC	—	37	3	3	6	0.162

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.14

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.16

2017-18 · Colorado College

+13.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32377

Forward overall

#1613

Forward born in 1998

#3080

in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG

→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)

0.22 Elite

NCAAe PPG

Mackenzie MacEachern

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG

→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)

0.25 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Jimmy DeVito

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG

→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)

0.21 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Jeff Kubiak

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG

→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)

0.19 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Brad Hawkinson

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG

→ Denver

0.19 No data

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Yim

Adrian · 2012-13

1.138 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Jeremy Dawes

St. Scholastica · 2005-06

1.036 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

George Thurston

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17

0.909 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.