← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 41 4 1 5 0.122 0.0448 0.0461 0.1288 0.1324
2016-17 NAHL 56 8 12 20 0.357 0.1312 0.1278 0.3769 0.3670
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 60 17 30 47 0.783 0.2878 0.2661 0.8268 0.7643
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 30 5 8 13 0.433
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2018-19 · Ferris State
-7.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28355
Forward overall
#1301
Forward born in 1997
#2477
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2024-25
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.