← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Rutkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 37 1 3 4 0.108 0.0265 0.0272 0.0744 0.0764
2014-15 Collingwood Blues OJHL 50 5 20 25 0.500 0.1226 0.1195 0.3443 0.3356
2015-16 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 39 7 17 24 0.615 0.1335 0.1247 0.4761 0.4449
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Utica D1 UCHC SR 20 2 11 13 0.650
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC 20 2 11 13 0.650
2018-19 Utica D1 UCHC JR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC 24 3 7 10 0.417
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC 15 1 3 4 0.267
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC 21 0 2 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
-17.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10063
Defenseman overall
#1447
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.