← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pavel Mikhasenok Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-01 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 21 6 8 14 0.667 0.0975 0.1022 0.3269 0.3426
2015-16 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 41 20 40 60 1.463 0.2141 0.2150 1.0499 1.0430
2016-17 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 56 12 21 33 0.589 0.2093 0.1966 0.6187 0.5810
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen SR 9 1 9 10 1.111
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 9 1 9 10 1.111
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen JR 23 4 10 14 0.609
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 23 4 10 14 0.609
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen SO 23 3 5 8 0.348
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 23 3 5 8 0.348
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 26 1 3 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
-20.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2645
Defenseman overall
#551
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.