IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Meininger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 26 0 3 3 0.115 0.0250 0.0253 0.0893 0.0903
2017-18 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 50 2 7 9 0.180 0.0390 0.0374 0.1393 0.1337
2018-19 — NAHL 29 0 5 5 0.172 0.0633 0.0591 0.1820 0.1700
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE — 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24520
Defenseman overall
#3127
Defenseman born in 1998
#6467
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Golanowski
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Schmitt
Utica · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Edwards
Castleton · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.