| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Philadelphia Little Flyers | EHL | 17 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.529 | 0.1223 | 0.1269 | 0.2590 | 0.2687 |
| 2015-16 | Philadelphia Little Flyers | EHL | 39 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 1.359 | 0.3139 | 0.3119 | 0.6650 | 0.6607 |
| 2016-17 | Odessa Jackalopes | NAHL | 46 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 0.543 | 0.1997 | 0.1854 | 0.5737 | 0.5326 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D1 | BigTen | FR | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.250 |
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | WIAC | — | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.250 |
| 2019-20 | Utica | D1 | UCHC | JR | 11 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.545 |
| 2019-20 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | GR | 11 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.545 |
| 2018-19 | Utica | D1 | UCHC | SO | 22 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.500 |
| 2018-19 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | SR | 22 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.500 |
| 2017-18 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | JR | 13 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.923 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.