← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Hale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 56 5 11 16 0.286 0.1015 0.1039 0.3000 0.3071
2017-18 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 54 9 11 20 0.370 0.1316 0.1282 0.3889 0.3789
2018-19 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 57 13 12 25 0.439 0.1558 0.1448 0.4605 0.4280
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 21 3 3 6 0.286
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 26 5 13 18 0.692
2019-20 Plattsburgh D1 FR 26 2 8 10 0.385
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 26 2 8 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Plattsburgh
+225.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36304
Forward overall
#1857
Forward born in 1998
#3663
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.