IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Biasillo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.1634 0.1720 0.4590 0.4831
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 53 16 14 30 0.566 0.1387 0.1383 0.3897 0.3886
2016-17 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 56 6 9 15 0.268 0.0984 0.0961 0.2828 0.2763
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 12 1 2 3 0.250
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 12 0 2 2 0.167
2017-18 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 25 6 4 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2017-18 · Fredonia
+313.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40032
Forward overall
#1944
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Beaulieu
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Moncur
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Gori
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.