← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Jaunich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 25 4 2 6 0.240 0.0646 0.0656 0.0583 0.0592
2016-17 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 43 5 8 13 0.302 0.1198 0.1250 0.3174 0.3311
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 35 1 4 5 0.143 0.0566 0.0562 0.1500 0.1491
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 9 17 26 0.448 0.1776 0.1685 0.4707 0.4467
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 27 15 21 36 1.333
2021-22 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 28 15 23 38 1.357
2020-21 Aurora D1 SO 11 5 5 10 0.909
2020-21 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 11 5 5 10 0.909
2019-20 Aurora D1 FR 27 4 8 12 0.444
2019-20 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 27 4 8 12 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2019-20 · Aurora
+320.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41280
Forward overall
#2165
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.