← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Weiand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rosemount High USHS-MN 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0405 0.0395 0.0777 0.0758
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 52 3 9 12 0.231 0.0848 0.0850 0.2436 0.2441
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 56 7 13 20 0.357 0.1312 0.1250 0.3769 0.3591
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen JR 6 1 3 4 0.667
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 6 1 3 4 0.667
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SO 28 2 3 5 0.179
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 28 2 3 5 0.179
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen FR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14985
Defenseman overall
#2166
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2011-12
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.