← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 62 10 21 31 0.500 0.3074 0.3059 1.4731 1.4660
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 45 14 16 30 0.667 0.4098 0.4098 1.9642 1.9642
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC 36 7 19 26 0.722
2024-25 Miami D1 NCHC 34 6 4 10 0.294
2023-24 Miami D1 NCHC 29 5 4 9 0.310
2022-23 UMass D1 HockeyEast 32 2 1 3 0.094
2021-22 UMass D1 HockeyEast 33 2 2 4 0.121
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 33 2 2 4 0.121
2020-21 UMass D1 HockeyEast FR 25 0 4 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2020-21 · UMass
-38.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10561
Forward overall
#433
Forward born in 2000
#994
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2018-19
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2001-02
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.