IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Willis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1837 0.1876 0.5284 0.5396
2017-18 — NAHL 63 12 28 40 0.635 0.2333 0.2267 0.6710 0.6521
2018-19 Austin Bruins NAHL 45 12 19 31 0.689 0.2531 0.2346 0.7281 0.6750
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 26 8 15 23 0.885
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2022-23 · Lindenwood
+346.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19708
Forward overall
#946
Forward born in 1998
#1255
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Calder
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kelly
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.