← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Stang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0557 0.0535 0.1069 0.1027
2015-16 Mason City Toros NA3HL 37 21 13 34 0.919 0.1153 0.1188 0.2901 0.2988
2016-17 Dauphin Kings MJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SR 11 5 5 10 0.909
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 11 5 5 10 0.909
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC JR 25 11 17 28 1.120
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 25 11 17 28 1.120
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SO 27 13 9 22 0.815
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 27 13 9 22 0.815
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 24 2 5 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2017-18 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+267.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32774
Forward overall
#1543
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.