IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Dahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-11-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 50 9 31 40 0.800 0.1170 0.1200 0.3922 0.4024
2018-19 — NAHL 54 1 8 9 0.167 0.0592 0.0573 0.1750 0.1693
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC — 27 2 3 5 0.185
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC — 25 0 4 4 0.160
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plattsburgh D1 — FR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 26 3 7 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Plattsburgh
+394.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10140
Defenseman overall
#1814
Defenseman born in 1998
#3564
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Shaheen
Hobart · 2014-15
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Devlin
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Fouts
New England College · 2000-01
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.