IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Peterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 16 22 38 0.864 0.1995 0.2094 0.4226 0.4437
2017-18 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 55 14 15 29 0.527 0.1937 0.1899 0.5566 0.5458
2018-19 Houston Bulls NAHL 59 25 39 64 1.085 0.3985 0.3729 1.1449 1.0714
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 30 1 3 4 0.133
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 38 5 14 19 0.500
2021-22 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 35 2 9 11 0.314
2020-21 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 12 4 5 9 0.750
2019-20 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 36 7 9 16 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2019-20 · Holy Cross
+73.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13230
Forward overall
#596
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Ammirato
Utica · 2013-14
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Everson
Utica · 2016-17
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dozois
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.