IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin McCabe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 32 0 6 6 0.188 0.0526 0.0548 0.1544 0.1610
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 50 3 21 24 0.480 0.1705 0.1658 0.5040 0.4901
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 14 0 7 7 0.500
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 25 1 4 5 0.200
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 19 1 6 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2018-19 · Connecticut College
+221.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12447
Defenseman overall
#2063
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Sloan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Mortson
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mohler
Curry · 2006-07
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.