← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Borowiec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 14 3 4 7 0.500 0.1404 0.1477 0.4111 0.4326
2017-18 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 26 5 4 9 0.346 0.1272 0.1249 0.3654 0.3589
2018-19 New Jersey 87's EHL 21 8 19 27 1.286 0.2970 0.2809 0.6291 0.5949
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 24 7 14 21 0.875
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D1 MAC JR 7 2 2 4 0.571
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 7 2 2 4 0.571
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D1 MAC SO 25 2 7 9 0.360
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 25 2 7 9 0.360
2018-19 Lebanon Valley D1 MAC FR 14 1 3 4 0.286
2018-19 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 14 1 3 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2018-19 · Lebanon Valley
+149.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17996
Forward overall
#853
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.