← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Borowiec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 14 3 4 7 0.500 0.1502 0.1581 0.4118 0.4333
2017-18 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 26 5 4 9 0.346 0.1285 0.1262 0.3666 0.3600
2018-19 New Jersey 87's EHL 21 8 19 27 1.286 0.2759 0.2609 0.6296 0.5954
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 24 7 14 21 0.875
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 7 2 2 4 0.571
2019-20 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 25 2 7 9 0.360
2018-19 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 14 1 3 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2018-19 · Lebanon Valley
+140.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20185
Forward overall
#780
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.