IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Britt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 52 1 22 23 0.442 0.1625 0.1665 0.4668 0.4782
2018-19 — USHL 63 5 16 21 0.333 0.1966 0.1851 1.0010 0.9426
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 North Dakota D1 NCHC — 40 7 7 14 0.350
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 37 2 10 12 0.324
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 37 3 18 21 0.568
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 27 2 3 5 0.185
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 30 1 1 2 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2019-20 · Quinnipiac
-60.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10818
Defenseman overall
#2020
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.