IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffen Sanom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 25 2 1 3 0.120 0.0426 0.0463 0.1260 0.1368
2018-19 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 48 13 19 32 0.667 0.1541 0.1595 0.5391 0.5581
2019-20 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 52 8 16 24 0.462 0.1639 0.1639 0.4845 0.4845
2020-21 — NAHL 42 7 10 17 0.405 0.1438 0.1438 0.4250 0.4250
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 20 4 10 14 0.700
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 23 8 11 19 0.826
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 13 6 4 10 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2022-23 · Lake Forest
+686.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
78%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25796
Forward overall
#1210
Forward born in 2000
#2076
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Cear
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.