IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Prior Lake High USHS-MN 23 2 6 8 0.348 0.0428 0.0443 0.0844 0.0873
2017-18 — NAHL 34 0 3 3 0.088 0.0313 0.0317 0.0930 0.0941
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 37 1 7 8 0.216 0.0768 0.0743 0.2280 0.2205
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 0 7 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2019-20 · Hamline
+417.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21976
Defenseman overall
#2937
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Lefave
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Sivets
St. Olaf · 2012-13
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rex Moe
Adrian · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.