IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Muschitiello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0816 0.0841 0.2345 0.2417
2018-19 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 57 16 20 36 0.632 0.2320 0.2287 0.6667 0.6572
2019-20 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 47 10 28 38 0.808 0.2970 0.2970 0.8534 0.8534
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16454
Forward overall
#776
Forward born in 1999
#866
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Meers
Trine · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Timmy Nicksic
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barone
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.