← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael McCosh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1132 0.1251 0.3000 0.3315
2018-19 Surrey Eagles BCHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0621 0.0647 0.2429 0.2530
2019-20 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 52 2 7 9 0.173 0.0686 0.0686 0.1817 0.1817
2020-21 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 55 2 4 6 0.109 0.0432 0.0432 0.1145 0.1145
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 24 0 6 6 0.250
2023-24 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 24 2 10 12 0.500
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 24 6 8 14 0.583
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 23 0 5 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2021-22 · Buffalo State
+185.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#56686
Forward overall
#3529
Forward born in 2000
#6639
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.