← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael McCosh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1050 0.1160 0.3016 0.3333
2018-19 Surrey Eagles BCHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0642 0.0669 0.2426 0.2527
2019-20 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 52 2 7 9 0.173 0.0636 0.0636 0.1827 0.1827
2020-21 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 55 2 4 6 0.109 0.0401 0.0401 0.1152 0.1152
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 24 0 6 6 0.250
2023-24 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 24 2 10 12 0.500
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 24 6 8 14 0.583
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 23 0 5 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2021-22 · Buffalo State
+193.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#56776
Forward overall
#3522
Forward born in 2000
#6544
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.