← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Schmaltz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-24 Country: USA
2019 · Round 6, Pick #192  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chicago Steel USHL 60 5 13 18 0.300 0.1770 0.1862 0.9010 0.9476
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 47 13 19 32 0.681 0.4017 0.4017 2.0450 2.0450
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 51 19 34 53 1.039 0.6130 0.6130 3.1211 3.1211
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 38 6 10 16 0.421
2023-24 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 36 1 10 11 0.306
2022-23 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 34 5 7 12 0.353
2021-22 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 39 8 16 24 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2021-22 · North Dakota
+286.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6745
Forward overall
#276
Forward born in 2001
#450
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Bentley (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2002-03
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.