← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Farthing Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 AJHL 53 2 10 12 0.226 0.0759 0.0733 0.2095 0.2023
2019-20 Chippewa Steel NAHL 51 13 16 29 0.569 0.2089 0.2089 0.6002 0.6002
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA 15 1 4 5 0.333
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA 15 0 4 4 0.267
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 20 1 3 4 0.200
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 24 1 5 6 0.250
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 20 1 1 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2020-21 · Ferris State
+44.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9354
Defenseman overall
#1844
Defenseman born in 1999
#3347
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.