IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carl Berglund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-16 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Färjestad BK U20 SHL-J20 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Färjestad BK U20 SuperElit 31 8 21 29 0.935 0.3665 0.3774 1.1491 1.1832
2018-19 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 37 5 11 16 0.432 0.2658 0.2627 1.2739 1.2588
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 36 12 15 27 0.750
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 33 9 19 28 0.849
2020-21 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 11 3 8 11 1.000
2019-20 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 34 12 11 23 0.676
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2019-20 · UMass Lowell
+156.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Congdon
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2004-05
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.