IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Medeiros Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Calgary Canucks AJHL 54 5 17 22 0.407 0.1366 0.1369 0.3770 0.3778
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 60 5 18 23 0.383 0.1408 0.1376 0.4046 0.3955
2019-20 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 50 6 19 25 0.500 0.1837 0.1837 0.5278 0.5278
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Army D1 AHA — 9 0 1 1 0.111
2020-21 Army D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8895
Defenseman overall
#1790
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Allen
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Christensen
Saint Anselm · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.