IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grigori Gotovets Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-01 Country: Belarus
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chippewa Steel NAHL 48 4 15 19 0.396 0.1568 0.1619 0.4156 0.4290
2019-20 Chippewa Steel NAHL 46 5 29 34 0.739 0.2928 0.2928 0.7760 0.7760
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 39 7 16 23 0.590 0.2336 0.2336 0.6191 0.6191
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 28 8 11 19 0.679
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 23 8 9 17 0.739
2022-23 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 25 3 8 11 0.440
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 22 7 13 20 0.909
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2021-22 · Hamilton
+555.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23095
Forward overall
#1053
Forward born in 2000
#1741
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Evans
St. John Fisher · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braeden Holcomb
St. Scholastica · 2019-20
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.