IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Garby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-09-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 44 1 16 17 0.386 0.1420 0.1505 0.4078 0.4322
2019-20 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 51 2 10 12 0.235 0.0864 0.0864 0.2484 0.2484
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 44 6 19 25 0.568 0.2088 0.2088 0.5997 0.5997
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Army D1 AHA SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Army D1 AHA JR 10 2 0 2 0.200
2022-23 Army D1 AHA SO 34 1 1 2 0.059
2021-22 Army D1 AHA FR 23 1 8 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2021-22 · Army
+175.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9021
Defenseman overall
#1712
Defenseman born in 2000
#3247
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cade Baker
Endicott · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Archambeault
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.