IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam McCanney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 55 4 8 12 0.218 0.0775 0.0805 0.2291 0.2381
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 50 15 17 32 0.640 0.2273 0.2273 0.6719 0.6719
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 60 19 20 39 0.650 0.2309 0.2309 0.6824 0.6824
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 28 15 12 27 0.964
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 28 20 8 28 1.000
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 27 23 17 40 1.482
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 26 6 11 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2021-22 · Stevenson
+848.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25513
Forward overall
#1194
Forward born in 2000
#2037
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Michalchuk
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jan Velich
Elmira · 2002-03
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Voigt
Tufts · 2009-10
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.